Gambia’s Opposition Struggles for Unity as 2026 Presidential Election Approaches.

Government Questions Opposition’s Political Programme.

The political contest ahead of The Gambia’s December 2026 presidential election intensified on Monday, 17 August, after Information Minister Dr Ismaila Ceesay questioned whether opposition parties negotiating electoral alliances have enough in common to present voters with a credible alternative to President Adama Barrow. Speaking on the Coffee Time Show, Ceesay argued that the opposition’s principal point of agreement appears to be its determination to remove Barrow, rather than a shared political ideology, governing programme or set of national priorities.

Ceesay’s comments come as opposition parties continue efforts to consolidate their positions before the December election. The minister challenged the various opposition groupings to explain what they would do differently if they were to take power, effectively shifting the political debate from opposition to Barrow toward the more consequential question of what an alternative government would actually deliver to Gambians.

Opposition Alliances Gather Momentum.

The criticism comes at a time when opposition figures are simultaneously presenting unity as their strongest route to defeating the incumbent. Ousainou Darboe, a veteran opposition leader and former vice president, has welcomed an alliance agreement involving opposition forces, describing the arrangement as a genuine partnership based on trust, confidence and shared values. His remarks contrast sharply with the government’s argument that opposition cooperation remains largely an electoral strategy rather than a coherent governing project.

Other opposition movements have also been working to build alliances ahead of the December vote. Talib Ahmed Bensouda’s UNITE Party, for example, has entered into a strategic arrangement with the National Unity Party, with Bensouda arguing that political parties can cooperate even when they do not agree on every issue, provided they share fundamental principles concerning the country’s future.

The competing narratives reveal the central challenge facing the opposition. Bringing several parties together can increase their combined electoral strength, but alliances can also expose differences over ideology, leadership and policy. For voters, the question will ultimately be whether these partnerships represent a genuine political alternative or simply an effort to prevent another Barrow victory.

Barrow Seeks a Third Term.

President Adama Barrow is seeking a third term in the election scheduled for 5 December 2026, a decision that has already generated significant political debate. Barrow first came to power after defeating long-serving ruler Yahya Jammeh in 2016 and was re-elected in 2021. His decision to pursue another term has become one of the defining issues of the current political cycle.

The third-term question is particularly sensitive because Barrow originally emerged from an opposition coalition that promised democratic reform after Jammeh’s rule. His administration has overseen initiatives including institutional reforms and the Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission process, although implementation of some reforms has been criticised as slow. The failure of an earlier constitutional reform process also remains part of the wider debate about the country’s democratic trajectory.

Barrow and his National People’s Party are nevertheless campaigning on their record in government. Infrastructure development has become an important part of that message. During a recent tour, communities in the North Bank Region publicly linked newly announced road projects to their support for the president, with some residents promising to reward his government at the ballot box because of the expected economic and social benefits of improved roads.

Development Versus Political Change.

The emerging election campaign is therefore beginning to revolve around two competing arguments. Barrow’s camp is presenting continuity, infrastructure investment and its governing record as reasons for voters to maintain the current administration, while opposition parties are attempting to turn the election into a referendum on the president’s time in office and the direction of the country.

That contest could become increasingly important as the campaign develops. Roads, public services, employment and economic opportunity are tangible issues for voters, while democratic reform, institutional independence and the question of presidential tenure carry a different but equally important political weight. The opposition’s challenge will be to connect those issues into a coherent programme rather than allowing the election to become simply a contest against one individual.

For the government, meanwhile, the danger is that dismissing opposition alliances as politically incoherent could underestimate the power of a unified opposition campaign. The 2016 election demonstrated that political forces with different backgrounds can come together around a common objective. The current opposition may therefore have more electoral significance if its various alliances can overcome their internal differences and present a single credible alternative.

December Vote Takes Shape.

With the presidential election less than four months away, The Gambia’s political competition is entering a decisive phase. The opposition is attempting to build the broadest possible coalition, while the Barrow administration is emphasising its record and questioning whether its challengers have a sufficiently clear programme for governing the country.

The political debate triggered by Ceesay’s comments is therefore unlikely to disappear. If opposition parties succeed in demonstrating that their alliances are based on a detailed common programme rather than simply opposition to Barrow, they could substantially strengthen their challenge. If they fail to do so, the president’s argument that voters should choose continuity over political uncertainty may become more persuasive.

For Gambian voters, the real test will be whether the coming campaign moves beyond personalities and alliances to address the country’s fundamental questions: how to strengthen democratic institutions, create jobs, improve public services, expand economic opportunities and ensure that political power remains accountable to citizens.

The December election will ultimately determine whether Gambians choose another term for Adama Barrow or open a new chapter in the country’s post-Jammeh political era. For now, however, the opposition faces the very question posed by the government’s information minister: if removing Barrow is the common objective, what exactly comes after him?
:::