Sports

CAF’s AFCON Calendar Shift Costs African Football $1 Billion.

Lanaka Valery

The Confederation of African Football (CAF) is facing fresh scrutiny after it emerged that the decision to change the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) from a biennial tournament to a four-year competition cost the organisation a commercial rights deal worth more than US$1 billion.

The revelation, published today, has reignited debate over one of the biggest decisions in African football history and raised questions about the financial trade-offs behind the move.

A Billion Dollar Opportunity Lost

According to the report, CAF was close to securing a commercial partnership valued at more than US$1 billion over eight years before deciding to restructure the AFCON calendar.

The commercial package had been built around the tournament being held every two years. Once CAF voted to switch AFCON to a four-year cycle beginning after the 2027 edition, the value of the proposed agreement dropped significantly because there would be fewer tournaments to market to broadcasters and sponsors.

Advertisement

As a result, CAF abandoned the original negotiations and launched a fresh bidding process for the commercial and marketing rights covering the 2028, 2032 and 2036 editions of the competition.

Why CAF Changed the Calendar

CAF President Patrice Motsepe has argued that moving AFCON to a four-year cycle will better align African football with the global football calendar and reduce scheduling conflicts with European leagues and FIFA competitions.

The change is also expected to give host nations more time to prepare infrastructure and improve the overall quality of the tournament.

Supporters believe the new format could make AFCON more commercially attractive over the long term, despite the immediate financial sacrifice.

Advertisement

Critics Question the Decision

The latest revelations have fuelled criticism from football administrators and analysts who argue that AFCON remains CAF’s biggest source of revenue and should not have been reduced in frequency.

Many believe the continent surrendered guaranteed income at a time when African football requires greater investment in youth development, infrastructure, women’s football and domestic leagues.

Others argue that the move gives FIFA and European football greater influence over Africa’s football calendar, potentially weakening the continent’s flagship competition.

A New Commercial Strategy

CAF has now opened a new international tender for the marketing and commercial rights to future AFCON tournaments.

Advertisement

The organisation hopes the revised process will attract global partners capable of delivering long-term financial growth while supporting its vision of making African football more competitive on the world stage.

Looking Ahead

The disclosure of the abandoned billion-dollar deal has intensified discussion about the future of African football governance.

While CAF believes the four-year cycle will strengthen AFCON in the years ahead, critics argue the organisation has sacrificed immediate financial security for an uncertain long-term strategy.

The success of the decision will ultimately depend on whether the new commercial rights process can recover the revenue lost and ensure African football continues to grow both on and off the pitch.

How do you feel about this?

Comments (0)

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts.

Leave a comment

Please sign in or create an account to join the conversation.

Recommended for you

East Africa Enters Final Preparation Phase for AFCON 2027.

5 minutes read

Tanzania Introduces Mandatory $44 Travel Insurance for Foreign Visitors.

4 minutes read

Kenya Inflation Rises for Third Consecutive Month as Food and Transport Costs Bite.

4 minutes read

NNPC Carries ₦8.2 Trillion in Forward Crude-Sale Obligations Into Nigeria’s Future.

5 minutes read

Nigeria Extends 2025 Capital Budget Implementation Period Again.

4 minutes read

Cameroon Pushes Cooking Gas Supply to 200 Tonnes a Day as Shortage Persists.

4 minutes read